Dataset

Entity Health Index — Category Sample

Modelled entity health scores across sample brands in six categories, with the component sub-scores exposed so the composite can be recomputed or reweighted.

CiteRank AI Research·5 March 2026·7 min readIllustrative example

Illustrative example. Illustrative example. This page shows the shape of a CiteRank deliverable using fictional inputs. No client workspace data is published and no figure here is a measurement.

DatasetEntitiesBenchmark

Key takeaways

—Component sub-scores ship alongside the composite, so you can disagree with our weighting and recompute it.
—Category medians are included, which is what makes a single brand's score interpretable.
—Brand names are placeholders — the value is in the distribution, not the labels.

Resource

Sample dataset

Placeholder dataset with modelled brands. Access is granted on request.

Brands: 300 modelled
Categories: 6
Format: CSV
Licence: CC BY 4.0

Request access

Schema

One brand per row, one column per component score.

›brand_id, category, region.
›name_consistency, location_accuracy, people_freshness, product_coverage.
›third_party_corroboration.
›entity_health — the composite, recomputable from the components.

Intended use

Benchmark an internal entity audit against a category distribution, or test alternative weightings of the composite.

Evidence basis

How this entry was produced

Illustrative example. This page shows the shape of a CiteRank deliverable using fictional inputs. No client workspace data is published and no figure here is a measurement.

Research type: Illustrative example — fictional scenario used for demonstration
Classification: Illustrative example
Data collected: Published 2026-03-05. No client data collection took place for this entry.
Prompt sample size: Not applicable — inputs are fictional.
Replays per prompt: Not applicable — no prompts were replayed against live engines to produce the figures on this page.
Engines covered: Not engine-specific.
Engine versions: Not stated. Engine vendors do not expose a stable build identifier for every model, so a version cannot be claimed accurately.
Methodology: A fictional brand scenario constructed to show what a CiteRank deliverable looks like end to end.

Limitations

Do not cite any figure on this page as a finding, benchmark or market statistic. It is not one.
Numbers here demonstrate report structure only and have no predictive value for your brand.
AI engines are non-deterministic: an identical prompt can return a different answer on replay, so any figure derived from them is an estimate, never a fixed value.
Engine vendors change retrieval and ranking behaviour without notice, so anything stated here describes the stated window only.

Methodology, limitations and disclosure

Every CiteRank study states who produced it, what it measured and where it stops being reliable. The full scoring model is documented on the methodology page.

Author: CiteRank AI Research
Author role: CiteRank AI Research team — measurement, prompt-corpus design and scoring
Review: Internal editorial review by the CiteRank AI Research team. No external or academic peer review was conducted.
Published: 5 Mar 2026
Last updated: 5 Mar 2026
AI engines: Not engine-specific
Model versions: Specific model build identifiers are not disclosed by every vendor and are therefore not claimed here.
Industry scope: Cross-industry
Geographic scope: Global
Language scope: English
Sample size: Not disclosed for this entry
Conflicts of interest: CiteRank AI publishes this research and sells an AI visibility platform. No third party funded, commissioned or reviewed this entry.
Data availability: Sample dataset — available on request.

Limitations

Figures in this entry are modelled and clearly labelled illustrative. They demonstrate structure and method; they are not observed client results.
AI engines are non-deterministic: an identical prompt can return a different answer on replay, so every figure is a sampled estimate rather than a fixed value.
Engine vendors change retrieval and ranking behaviour without notice. Findings describe the sampling window stated above, not a permanent state.
Results describe the prompt corpus that was designed for this study. A different corpus for the same brand can produce a materially different picture.
This entry does not disclose a sample size, so its figures should not be treated as statistically representative.

Corrections and revisions

No corrections have been issued for this entry since publication on 5 Mar 2026. If a figure or claim here is wrong, write to research@citerank.in. Substantive corrections are published inline with the date they were made, and the original wording is retained in the note.

Suggested citation

CiteRank AI Research (2026). Entity Health Index — Category Sample. CiteRank AI. https://www.citerank.in/research/dataset-entity-health-index

← Back to the Demo Lab