'Which CGM should I buy?' — AI answers with two brands. Is yours one of them?
CiteRank measures who AI engines recommend in medtech & devices — across ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, Microsoft Copilot, xAI Grok and Meta AI, in both grounded and ungrounded modes — and fixes why it isn't you.
Vertical benches currently run 3 engines; full tracking covers all 8.
The medtech & devices leaderboard, measured.
Top-5 brand mention rate, first-mention rate and Share of Voice — straight from the citerank-bench scoring tables, recomputed weekly.
Benchmark for MedTech & Devices runs with our first customer in this vertical. The leaderboard below is an illustrative sample built from the blueprint's brand registry — numbers are placeholders, not measurements.
Illustrative sample — benchmark not yet completed.
Real medtech & devices prompts, eight engines, one question: did you get cited?
Three failure modes specific to healthcare.
Same-3-clinics lock-in: AI defaults to a handful of names per city and topic.
Trust signals AI looks for (NABH, doctor entities, accreditations) are missing or unstructured on most sites.
Patient-safety framing means a wrong AI answer is a real-world risk, not a ranking nuisance.
How a medtech & devices benchmark gets built.
URL, competitors, prompt seed list. 5 minutes.
250+ prompts × 8 engines × 2 modes, 10–30 replays each.
Schema, llms.txt, entity hygiene, content briefs — shipped.
Weekly re-runs, deltas with 95% confidence bands.
What a 90-day citation delta looks like.
Illustrative pattern based on our methodology — first customer results publish Q4 2026.
Cited in 1 of 25 high-intent medtech & devices prompts across 8 engines (4%).
Cited in 9 of the same 25 prompts (36%) — schema, llms.txt and entity fixes shipped over 3 weekly re-runs.
MedTech & Devices case study publishes after the first 90-day window.
We don't ship anonymous success stories. Every case study card on this page becomes a real logo, real prompts and real deltas after the customer's 90-day window closes.
Coming in the MedTech & Devices visibility report.
Winning spec-comparison prompts with extractable spec tables
Notify me when publishedIndia-specific device content vs US clinical content in citations
Notify me when publishedMedTech & Devices questions, answered.
How is CiteRank different from Practo / 1mg listings?+
Those surfaces optimise for their own funnel. CiteRank measures how often ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, Microsoft Copilot, xAI Grok and Meta AI actually name your brand for medtech & devices buyer prompts, then fixes the schema, entity and content gaps so the engines have something to cite besides the aggregator.
Which segments / cities do you cover for this vertical?+
We start with your 250+ highest-intent buyer prompts — segmented by city, persona and price band as relevant — and expand the prompt graph weekly. Coverage scope is set during the 5-minute onboarding.
How fast to first new citation?+
First measurable citation lift is typically 3–5 weeks after the first fix pass (schema, llms.txt, entity, content briefs). Re-runs are weekly with 95% confidence bands so you can attribute deltas to specific fixes.
Is our data sent to LLMs?+
Only the public buyer prompts we run on your behalf reach the engines — exactly what a prospective customer would type. We do not send your CRM, customer data, or internal documents to any LLM.
Start with one snapshot. Scale into weekly monitoring.
250+ prompts × 8 engines × 2 modes. Brand-mention report and gap analysis.
Weekly re-runs, deltas with confidence bands, alerting on rank/citation changes.
Monitor + shipped fixes: schema, llms.txt, entity, content briefs and re-measurement.
