How is CiteRank AI different from Competitor 1, Competitor 2 or other SEO tools?

Legacy SEO tools measure Google rankings. CiteRank AI measures whether ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity and Google AI Overviews actually recommend a brand when buyers ask a question. The two are complementary, but AI search is a separate surface with its own ranking signals that traditional rank trackers do not audit.

Which AI engines does CiteRank AI track?

CiteRank tracks citations across ChatGPT, Google Gemini, Anthropic Claude, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, Microsoft Copilot, xAI Grok and Meta AI. Each prompt is fired 10 to 30 times per engine to control for model variance.

How accurate is the visibility score?

The visibility score is a composite of citation share, recommendation order and sentiment, aggregated across 10 to 30 replays per prompt per engine, and is reported with 95% confidence bands so users can distinguish signal from model variance.

Can I track competitors with CiteRank AI?

Yes. Starter tracks 5 competitors, Growth tracks 25, and Agency is unlimited across 10 workspaces. There is no per-competitor charge on any plan.

What does the free audit include?

A 14-day free trial includes AI citation audits across keywords and all tracked LLMs, monitoring, PDF export, and a competitor view showing which brands AI cites instead of yours. No credit card is required to start.

Travel · Industry benchmark

Stage 0 · Framework live · benchmark pending

Itinerary prompts are the new travel agent. Whose tours does AI build them around?

CiteRank measures who AI engines recommend in tours & experiences — across ChatGPT, Gemini and Claude, in both grounded and ungrounded modes — and fixes why it isn't you.

Run free audit See sample report Book a demo

3 × 2

Engines × modes (grounded + ungrounded)

250+

Tours & Experiences buyer prompts per run

Weekly

Re-runs · 95% confidence bands

Who AI recommends today

The tours & experiences leaderboard, measured.

Top-5 brand mention rate, first-mention rate and Share of Voice — straight from the citerank-bench scoring tables, recomputed weekly.

Benchmark for Tours & Experiences runs with our first founding customer in this vertical. The leaderboard below is an illustrative sample built from the blueprint's brand registry — numbers are placeholders, not measurements.

#
Brand
Mention rate
First-mention
Share of Voice

01

Thrillophilia

62%

31%

34%

02

TravelTriangle

48%

22%

24%

03

Veena World

39%

14%

18%

04

WanderOn

27%

14%

05

MakeMyTrip

18%

10%

Illustrative sample — benchmark not yet completed.

Sample prompt set

Real tours & experiences prompts, three engines, one question: did you get cited?

Buyer prompt
ChatGPT
Gemini
Claude
You cited?

"best Ladakh bike tour operator with mechanic support"

—

—

—

Not yet

"7-day Kerala itinerary with houseboat — who should I book with?"

—

—

—

Not yet

"safe trekking operators for first-timers in Himachal"

—

—

—

Not yet

"weekend experiences near Bangalore under ₹5,000 per person"

—

—

—

Not yet

Where the citations leak

Three failure modes specific to travel.

01

OTA capture: MakeMyTrip/Booking/Agoda are cited as the booking surface, even when you're the brand named.

02

Itinerary prompts compose recommendations from blog content you don't own.

03

Seasonal answers go stale fast — engines keep quoting last year's prices and amenities.

Methodology

How a tours & experiences benchmark gets built.

01

Onboard

URL, competitors, prompt seed list. 5 minutes.

02

Audit

250+ prompts × 3 engines × 2 modes, 10–30 replays each.

03

Fix

Schema, llms.txt, entity hygiene, content briefs — shipped.

04

Re-run

Weekly re-runs, deltas with 95% confidence bands.

Read the full sample report

Illustrative pattern

What a 90-day citation delta looks like.

Illustrative pattern based on our methodology — first cohort results publish Q4 2026.

Before

1 / 25

Cited in 1 of 25 high-intent tours & experiences prompts across 3 engines (4%).

After · 90 days

9 / 25

Cited in 9 of the same 25 prompts (36%) — schema, llms.txt and entity fixes shipped over 3 weekly re-runs.

Founding cohort

Tours & Experiences case study publishes after the first 90-day window.

We don't ship anonymous success stories. Every case study card on this page becomes a real logo, real prompts and real deltas after the customer's 90-day window closes.

Founding seats · openApply for a founding seat

Insights

Coming in the Tours & Experiences visibility report.

Article · in the tours & experiences report

Operator vs marketplace: who AI credits for the same tour

Notify me when published

Article · in the tours & experiences report

Itinerary-prompt GEO for experience brands

Notify me when published

Article · in the tours & experiences report

Keeping seasonal answers current: a freshness playbook

Notify me when published

FAQ

Tours & Experiences questions, answered.

How is CiteRank different from Google Business Profile / aggregator listings?+

Those surfaces optimise for their own funnel. CiteRank measures how often ChatGPT, Gemini and Claude actually name your brand for tours & experiences buyer prompts, then fixes the schema, entity and content gaps so the engines have something to cite besides the aggregator.

Which segments / cities do you cover for this vertical?+

We start with your 250+ highest-intent buyer prompts — segmented by city, persona and price band as relevant — and expand the prompt graph weekly. Coverage scope is set during the 5-minute onboarding.

How fast to first new citation?+

First measurable citation lift is typically 3–5 weeks after the first fix pass (schema, llms.txt, entity, content briefs). Re-runs are weekly with 95% confidence bands so you can attribute deltas to specific fixes.

Is our data sent to LLMs?+

Only the public buyer prompts we run on your behalf reach the engines — exactly what a prospective customer would type. We do not send your CRM, customer data, or internal documents to any LLM.